"The End of Death? Conscious Life in Global Cyberspace" By Michael Purdy is an interesting article in the first issue of The Journal of Conscious Evolution.(just when you started questioning evolution I give you a new intellectual rush).
This piece is a
brief essay about the idea of humanity developing a kind of immortality through our minds being transfered to silicon chips: Unlike some of the other references I have posted about, Purdy thinks that this kind of future is a bleak possibility Here is an excerpt from the essay:
What the end of death, life in cyberspace, points to are the ultimate fruits of technological rationality: a life without end, i.e., an infinite lifetime warranty on this product called human life-life without illness or problem. In cyberspace all is plastic and manipulatable-at a whim. The ability to be all-knowing, to be smarter and faster than the limits of the human body are all here; and as a bonus, it all comes at small expense. Chips require very little energy and the usage gets smaller every year.
These are dreams-desires of an abstracted, rational consciousness. These visions of the rational instrumental consciousness are still far from a four dimensional, space-free and time-free existence, and are quite at odds with Gebser's sense of the integral. There is no concretion or integration in life in cyberspace, the dimensionality is limited, and space and time are predefined by the system of operation-the imagination would support these visions of cyberspace, but cosmic (integral) consciousness calls upon us to live an awareness that is present. There is no wholeness, no spirit in putting consciousness on a chip.
We can say, however, that the cyber impulse is cerebral, that the desire is for something spiritual and integrating; that there is a movement toward what is open and free in this thought for immortal existence. There are aspirations (things breathed) here for a life free of hierarchy, class, gender, and open to divinity. I think there is a desire for diaphaneity and wholeness, even if it is not realized. Maybe, future extensions of cyberspace will be more integral; right now it is not cyberspace that is integral, but a human awareness of cyberspace that is striving for the integral.
Death is more universal than life; everyone dies but not everyone lives. A. Sachs
I think we can say that the move to gain immortality through life in cyberspace is a failed, if imaginative, project. If possible it would solve the problem of death, but it wouldn't offer much of a life. It might offer immortality but would leave the same wonderful challenge-how to live.
Some of my other posts on this subject are:
Business Week: The Mind Is Immortal
When I Die, I Want To Go Up To That Google in the Sky
As an amusing aside, Perry cites the following quote
"It's not that I'm afraid to die. I just don't want to be there when it happens" Woody Allen
I don't think I could have said it better.
Recent Comments